Factor-based summarization of reviews is useful:
I’m currently looking for a review of social media summarization. Any pointers?
Factor-based summarization of reviews is useful:
I’m currently looking for a review of social media summarization. Any pointers?
Tags: factors, reviews, summarization
Posted in argumentative discussions, PhD diary, social web | Comments (0)
I’ve been on Google Wave for about a week and a half. So far I only have things to complain about.
I watched, with rapt fascination, the hour-long intro video ((oops–make that 1:20!)) back in May. Though video is usually something I consume for entertainment, not information.
So it may be that my hopes were too high. Given that Wave is a ‘preview’ (is that one level below beta?), there’s still hope for the future.
Things I don’t like about wave:
For more information about wave, check Google’s About pages, Wikipedia’s overview, or the in-progress wiki aiming to The Complete Guide to Google Wave. At the moment, I’ve still got a few invites to give away, if you’d like to try it out for yourself.
Overall, I’m struck by the length and lack of summarization in Wave. One of the reasons I keep using gmail is that it (often but not always) helps me to keep track of the conversation. Wave doesn’t do that right now: the ‘preview’ or subject line just pulls from the first blip. (Even just pulling from the latest blip would help!)
I have a few active collaborations in Wave (SIOC, the ‘unofficial code4lib conference wave’, and a small advertising/new media conversation we’re testing moving from email). Perhaps as time goes on I’ll have a better understanding of what it’s good for in practice. Meanwhile, I welcome pointers to others’ experiences, especially easy-to-digest tips about how you’re using Wave!
Tags: Google Wave, summarization, wave
Posted in information ecosystem, random thoughts | Comments (0)